• Are We The Bad Guys?

    Are We The Bad Guys?

    After Donald Trump and JD Vance’s embarrassing outburst at Ukrainian President Zelenskyy in the White House last week, the potential for peace, which once seemed within reach, was jettisoned into the distant future.

    Trump doubled on his way to another weekend trip in Florida, stating that if Zelenskyy wanted peace, he was the one who needed to change. As expected, Speaker of the House Johnson, Senator Lindsey Graham, and other vocal Republicans defended Trump’s actions while criticizing the ambushed Ukrainian President.

    The immediate fallout from Friday’s spectacle was Zelenskyy leaving the United States without a signed mineral rights deal—a deal Trump had been aggressively pushing for. However, the long-term impact was even more significant. As we outlined in our coverage last week, America’s influence on Ukraine’s future is far greater than most other countries’.

    As the days passed, Trump and his administration continued to make bold claims against Ukraine, with more Republicans rallying behind him. Even mainstream media coverage has framed the incident as a “shouting match,” implying equal blame for the debacle.

    But Friday was just the beginning. Trump has clearly decided to leverage the incident to justify actions he was already planning.

    On Monday, Trump paused U.S. military aid to Ukraine while pressuring Zelenskyy—but not Putin—to find a quick resolution to the war. He cited “insufficient gratitude” for the $180 billion in military aid the U.S. had provided, most of which predated Trump’s presidency.

    When Zelenskyy pointed out that the U.S. position and the U.N.’s failure to hold Russia accountable made near term peace unlikely, Trump grew more agitated. He even claimed, “this guy doesn’t want peace as long as he has America’s backing,” despite Trump’s apparent willingness to withdraw that backing.

    Meanwhile, Trump instructed his staff to draft a plan for easing sanctions on Russia, aiming to strengthen U.S.-Russia ties. This included the White House asking the State and Treasury departments to draft a list of sanctions that could be eased for discussion with Russian representatives in just the coming days.

    The word ambushed, which I used earlier, appears to be the accurate descriptor here. Trump’s admiration for Russia—and specifically for Putin—has clouded his ability to collaborate with Ukraine and Europe. Making it hard to believe Friday’s events were mere coincidence.

    Thankfully, Europe has nearly unanimously rallied behind Ukraine. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas declared, “Ukraine is Europe! We stand by Ukraine,” a sentiment echoed by leaders from the U.K., Germany, France, and others.

    While the U.S. has halted aid to Ukraine, Europe has renewed its commitment, with some nations pledging even greater support. Additionally, European leaders are urging their countries to seize $218 billion in frozen Russian central bank assets held in Belgium. Believing these funds could bolster Ukraine’s defense and recovery efforts.

    Despite Europe’s efforts to fill the void left by the U.S., the core issue remains unchanged.

    Russia initiated this war, violating a peace agreement and invading Ukraine with the intent of redrawing borders. Zelenskyy was right to assert on Friday that without safeguards to punish Russia for such actions, Putin will simply repeat them.

    During his 2024 campaign, Trump and his allies made bold guarantees. Trump claimed Kamala Harris’s incompetence “would get us into a World War III guaranteed,” and vowed to end Russia’s invasion of Ukraine within 24 hours or even before he took the oath of office.

    Now, well past Trump’s first 24 hours in office, it seems he is fanning the flames of Russia’s aggression. Under his leadership, not Harris’, the U.S. edges closer to World War III, standing apart from Europe and Ukraine.

    When Trump blindly follows Putin into World War III, most Republicans will ask, “Why did Zelenskyy let this happen?” But the real question should be, “Are we the bad guys?”

    The answer is, indubitably, yes.

  • Zelenskyy Refuses To Bend A Knee

    Zelenskyy Refuses To Bend A Knee

    The geopolitical landscape across Europe and the Middle East is fraught with tension, and the current U.S. Administration’s role in it is a topic of much debate. Amidst this turmoil, one President who has been fighting for his country’s very existence refused to bend a knee on Friday (February 28th) to the United States’ wannabe dictator, Trump.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the President of Ukraine, has an intriguing background with a somewhat non-traditional path to any country’s presidency. Although he graduated from law school, a fact often omitted by the press, he never practiced law. Instead, Zelenskyy pursued a career in comedy, eventually landing the role of the fictional Ukrainian President in the wildly successful “Servant of the People” from 2015 to 2019. This skyrocketed his popularity and paved the way for his actual presidency in 2019.

    I’m going to divert off topic for a paragraph, because I think it’s also important to point out that Zelenskyy voiced Paddington the Bear in the Ukrainian voiceover for Paddington and Paddington 2; one of the world’s most beloved film characters of all time.

    Zelenskyy’s rise to prominence took a dramatic turn when Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022. The tension between the two countries had been building for over a year, reaching a boiling point as Russian soldiers amassed at the border.

    We all know about the Russian invasion of Ukraine and how it’s still a waging war with far-reaching implications. Most of us are also aware of Trump’s recent comments on the war as his administration tries to broker a peace deal that includes talks with Russia but omits Ukraine. After some back-and-forth displays of manliness, the seemingly fearless leader of Ukraine and the person in charge of the United States finally got things moving in the right direction with a mineral deal that was supposed to be the first step toward peace.

    Then there was the Oval Office meeting between the two.

    Before I dive into that, let’s backtrack a bit. The history is important due to what Zelenskyy laid claim to during February 28th’s Oval Office confrontation.

    In 2014, Vladimir Putin and Russia invaded and annexed the Crimean Peninsula, part of Ukraine. Russia knew they had no right to claim this land, and that was made clear by the fact that Russian soldiers did the seizing without insignia. This conflict lasted until February 12, 2015, when the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany agreed on a 12-point peace plan that proposed, among other terms, the removal of foreign troops from Ukrainian territory. Zelenskyy was not in power in Ukraine at the time, but Putin was very much in charge of Russia.

    After that, Putin backed off Ukraine for a bit so he could meddle in Syria in 2015, interfere in the 2016 United States Presidential Election, and change the Russian Constitution to remain in power much longer than he was previously legally able. But Putin got bored and ignored his own signature on that 2015 peace plan, and a subsequent 2019 peace deal, to re-invade Ukraine in 2022, bringing us back full-circle to where we are today: the Oval Office.

    About 40 minutes into a tensely political but progressing press conference in the United States’ White House Oval Office, JD Vance decided to use this moment to attack President Biden and declared that it was time to move to diplomacy. Zelenskyy politely interrupted and referenced the 2014 invasion, most notably that Putin would not respect diplomacy unless there were stout terms in place to protect Ukraine. This did not sit well with Vance, who then demanded that Zelenskyy figuratively take a knee and bow to Trump.

    Zelenskyy essentially refused. This set Trump off, who made sure that while he showed his frustration with Zelenskyy, he also insulted and name-called President Biden while separating his own administration from other United States Presidencies. JD Vance, now seeing daddy mad, doubled down and went after Zelenskyy, claiming that the Ukrainian President was on a “propaganda tour” and that his country was in trouble.

    Trump interrupted a few more times, including to correct Zelenskyy about the 2014 invasion by declaring the wrong year, and more importantly waving his finger in Zelenskyy’s face as if he were a scorned parent correcting a child.

    But the real issue arose when JD Vance was speaking (4 minutes into the CNN video), when he noted that Zelenskyy said nice things about President Biden but has yet to thank Trump for having Ukraine’s back, which at this point is still up in the air whether Trump does or not.

    Zelenskyy wouldn’t back down, and this set Trump off.

    Trump, as he has torn through Americans’ freedoms and livelihoods, has still seen praise by the very people surrounding him. Just this week, Trump’s first cabinet meeting, which included the unappointed and unelected Elon Musk, was even a love fest as the entire group bowed to their king.

    So here we are, consequences well in hand, and the far-right will frame this to be Zelenskyy’s fault and problem. And if you don’t believe that, revisit the video where Trump makes it clear that nothing that happens in Ukraine, good or bad for either side, will impact the United States.

    What’s next? That’s a tough one. We all know Trump won’t budge. And with his good little soldier, JD Vance, by his side, he’ll be reminded he is in the right and if he doesn’t stand his ground on Zelenskyy and Ukraine, then he’ll look weak.

    America’s influence on what happens in Ukraine is much larger than what happens in a meeting with Putin or Zelenskyy. At the direction of Trump, the United States voted with Russia, breaking from Europe, during a United Nations hearing earlier this week. And at the more influential and powerful 15-member UN Security Council meeting, an unamended US resolution—which called for an end to the conflict but contained no criticism of or terms for Russia—was passed by 10 votes.

    As long as the United States turns the Russian invasion of Ukraine into a “how can the United States win the most and Trump look the best,” the war will wage on, or even worse, Russia will come out on top. Being a founding member of the United Nations, and a veto-carrying member of its powerful Security Council, makes the United States’ voice too strong to be wielded by a cowardly man who cannot take criticism or be opposed.

    Although it didn’t gain ground for Ukraine, Zelenskyy’s firm stance in Washington DC should motivate those who see Trump for what he really is. It should remind everyone that people can only be bullied so much and pushed so far before they stand back up and push back. If anything, Zelenskyy’s stance might not get Ukraine to a peaceful state sooner, but it might help the rest of Europe grow a spine and stand up to the Putin-Trump alliance. Something that is needed sooner rather than later.

    Zelenskyy, real Americans salute you today! Hopefully Europe does too.

  • The GOP’s Effort to Erase LGBTQ

    The GOP’s Effort to Erase LGBTQ

    I was speaking to a family member just a month ahead of the 2024 election, and the topic of the Republican Party, specifically Trump himself, enacting harm against the LGBTQ community arose. I was met with the snarky retort of “what did Trump do to harm the queer community in his first term?” My response, although it could have easily been pages of text, was quick and to the point. I cited that he enacted more legislation and appointments that targeted the LGBTQ community than any other President in modern history. My presentation of facts was quickly dismissed.

    But that discussion last fall brought a concern to the forefront of the multitude of concerns I had of another Trump Presidency. How quickly would Trump come after the LGBTQ community?

    Unfortunately, it took us almost no time to find that out.

    The answer was immediate. And worse, the damage was even greater than his first term. The LGBTQ community, including my daughter, were in the crosshairs of those in power. And we were quickly made aware, the firing squad wasn’t going to stop until nobody in that community remained standing.

    We’re barely a month into Trump’s second term, and his orders have been plentiful already.

    On Inauguration Day, one of the first executive orders Trump issued declared that the federal government would only recognize two sexes: male and female. It was a statement order, serving mainly to make clear the government’s archaic stance, without much tangible effect.

    He moved on quickly though, issuing another series of orders attacking an already marginalized group who had fought so hard for any rights in the first place. Even his quest to remove any and all DEI initiatives, not just in government but in the private sector as well, also heavily impacted the LGBTQ community.

    But, it was one letter in the spectrum that Trump seems to have really gone after to start 2025; the T. Transgender individuals were hit with a series of early executive orders.

    Trump has acted quickly to send a message to transgender Americans, and that message is one of planned eradication.

    He started with an executive order to ban federal funding for gender-affirming care to minors (anyone under the age of 19). The order included orders for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to publish a review within 90 days of existing literature on best practices for promoting the health of children with gender dysphoria.

    Trump then issued an executive order directing the Department of Defense to formulate a new policy targeting transgender service members. The order even stated that “expressing a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service.”

    And this was before we even wrapped up January. In February he removed Title IX protection for transgender athletes through an executive order that bars trans women and girls from participating in women’s sports at both K-12 schools and colleges.

    He then expanded this attack by announcing that transgender athletes would be barred from obtaining visas for the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles, eventually going further to ban them from obtaining visas for any sport or event, and permanently barring them from entering the country.

    Many are now questioning what’s next? He’s been relentless in his first month, what do the next 47 hold?

    Well, much of what is next is already telegraphed in Project 2025.

    Although Trump frequently distanced himself from Project 2025 on the campaign trail, it has clearly been his playbook since being sworn in. In fact, Trump’s early orders follow Project 2025 so closely, it’s hard to separate Project 2025 from any separate initiative Trump claims as his own.

    Let’s not be shocked he lied about Project 2025. Lying is something he’s done well. It wasn’t the first time and won’t be the last. But the point is, if he’s already deploying one initiative after another from the conservative manifesto, meaning we should brace for what is next.

    Project 2025 calls on the Department of Justice (that Trump now rules with an iron fist) to defend the First Amendment right of those who would discriminate against LGBTQ+ people. Something that has also already been flirted with by some early executive orders.

    Project 2025 also recommends the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reverse the focus on “‘LGBTQ+ equity,’ subsidizing single-motherhood, disincentivizing work, and penalizing marriage,’ replacing such policies with those encouraging marriage, work, motherhood, fatherhood, and nuclear families.”

    The Project 2025 playbook laments the fact that family policies and programs under President Biden’s HHS are “fraught with agenda items focusing on ‘LGBTQ+ equity,’” making it clear that they intend to roll those agenda items back.

    Project 2025 demands the abolishment of the Gender Policy Council, which it views as promoting abortion and the ‘new woke gender ideology.’ It also proposes “new structures and positions” in place of the Gender Policy Council, a new structure that would promote “life and strengthen the traditional family.”

    If the attack on Title IX isn’t enough, Project 2025 also calls on the current administration to limit the application of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, which held that Title VII’s sex discrimination protections applied to LGBTQ+ people.

    And if USAID still was able to provide aid, Project 2025 declared that Trump issue orders that would prevent any of that aid from being used for transgender people.

    And all of that is just the beginning of what the Trump administration intends to do at the expense of our LGBTQ neighbors and loved ones. It’s Project 2025, not Project 2025 through 2028. So although we can telegraph what’s ahead by what’s documented, there’s likely so much more we don’t know yet. 

    I can say, with near certainty, that the administration will not stop at the letter T. The far-right will not be satisfied until the rights of all lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people are hiding their truth and suffering the consequences of a small vocal group that is afraid of change. Change that does not impact them at all.

    And if you seem to be heartless enough to say, “who cares?” Then I ask who is next? Because it won’t stop there.

    Let’s not overlook that Trump’s focus on eradicating entire groups of individuals comes at the expense of the main reasons people claim they voted for him. All of this is being done to the LGBTQ community, immigrants, and other minorities while we sit here with Trump gutting our economy and driving up the prices of the goods he campaigned on lowering the prices of.

    The eradication of these communities is actually driving the economy into the gutter by pulling workers away from jobs, “DEI” products off shelves, and causing people to be afraid to even leave their house.

    And although the economy is why so many claimed to vote for Trump, let’s be clear and remember that he did promise this too. This threat was sewn deeply into his campaign. So those that supported him who are now confused and dumbfounded by his actions have no ground.

    But it’s not just about laws. Project 2025, and therefore the administration filled with its co-authors enacting the plan, told us why they want these changes.

    Project 2025 states that society today includes “toxic normalization of transgenderism.” Going beyond framing laws and orders, and directly attacking a group of human beings in a governance guide.

    But normalization of “transgenderism” isn’t toxic, it’s simply an extension of basic human rights to fellow Americans. It’s barely an effort to even just let someone else be. Being compassionate and sympathetic to those around you does not make you a good person. Being compassionate and sympathetic to those you do not see or know is what defines you.

    And bluntly, 2025 is defining a number of people in ways they should be ashamed of. Most notably, Trump and those promoting MAGA hate.

  • The Cultural Significance of Kendrick Lamar’s Halftime Show

    The Cultural Significance of Kendrick Lamar’s Halftime Show

    Football fan or not, it’s possible that you were one of the roughly 120 million viewers who tuned in to the Super Bowl to see a dynasty get tested and their opponent play nearly a perfect 60 minutes of football. But mixed in with the commercials, the big game, and plenty of Kevin Burkhardt praising Rupert Murdoch (the human equivalent of black mold), many were not expecting to be treated to what might be the most culturally significant and important Super Bowl Halftime Show of all time.

    Kendrick Lamar was announced as the Super Bowl performer back near the beginning of the NFL’s 2024 season. Right in the middle of his epic rise from superstar to legend, mostly due to his most recent Drake diss track, “Not Like Us.” His song had taken over airwaves, phone apps, and—inappropriately—even the halls of middle schools and high schools all across the country.

    The fact that Roc Nation and Apple chose him to headline, with only limited cameos from other musical artists, shows how significant Lamar was becoming. His epic rise, fueled by his beef with dimming superstar Drake, saw the two verbally attacking each other with finesse across more than nine different musical tracks.

    But if you think Lamar’s performance and lyrics during the halftime show were all about Drake, you weren’t paying attention.

    From the very first line of “the revolution ’bout to be televised, you picked the right time but the wrong guy” to closing with the message filled, “TV Off,” Lamar and company pulled absolutely no punches.

    Samuel L. Jackson came out dressed in a very patriotic red, white, and blue, doubling as both America’s current Uncle Sam and Lamar’s conscience, telling the hip-hop artist he was “too loud, too reckless, too ghetto” and that he needed “to tighten up!”

    Jackson’s “ghetto” remark was likely a response to the letter sent by a group of Republican Louisiana lawmakers to the Greater New Orleans Sports Foundation ahead of the big game, demanding Lamar’s halftime show not be “lewd” or “offensive” like they felt some performances of the past had.

    During “Humble,” audiences were unexpectedly treated to 60 dancers dressed in red, white, and blue, lined up to look like the American flag. As Lamar stood in the middle, fracturing the flag, he sang about coming from poverty, a place so many in this country continue to be trapped in.

    Even Serena Williams’ crip walk was more significant than its surface appearance. Yes, she had dated Drake, and yes she was symbolically dancing across his career’s grave, but Williams has also been one of the most dominant presences in a predominantly white sport where she had previously been criticized for dancing in a similar fashion in celebration of her gold medal at the London Olympics in 2012. Critics at the time stated her dance was inappropriate and even a glorification of gang violence.

    His nearly 12-minute set set the internet on fire well before he was done and saw Donald Trump leave about halfway through it. Although Trump’s departure was likely pre-planned so he could get back to burning the constitution in Washington, DC, with him probably not even picking up on a hint of what Lamar was putting down, his cronies were much more aware of what was happening.

    Right-wing influencers and politicians were all over the internet making not-racist racist remarks about the performance. Rep. Lauren Boebert asked if she was “the only one needing subtitles for this!!” Former Rep. George Santos called the show “absolute TRASH.” Eric Daughtery, Madison Cawthorne, and any other wealthy white MAGA influencer born from a trust fund had something negative to say. And to no surprise, Matt Gaetz seemed unimpressed as well, possibly when he found out Lamar was speaking against grown men hitting on “a minor.”

    The 12 minutes meant something and, more importantly, stated something. Lamar, like many other Americans, was getting back up off the mat and was showing he was ready to start speaking up again. For Hims might have ignorantly used Childish Gambino’s “This Is America” in an ad about how much they overcharge for weight loss support, but Lamar was making sure you looked right past that and saw what America really is.

    But even if you were only there for “Not Like Us” and were excitedly gleaming “A Minor” simultaneously with a hundred million others, it’s important to understand why that song has become what it has become. Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” didn’t win best song and album of the year at the Grammys because it was a cleverly written diss track; it took home some of music’s most prestigious awards because it has become an anthem and a war cry during a very tumultuous time.

    Yes, almost all the lyrics of the track are specific to Drake, as intended by Lamar, but the words “they not like us” is a reminder that those who support the racism, sexism, and homophobia of the far-right, or even those who tolerate it because of a specific promise or agenda they support, well, they are not like us.

  • History is Rewritten by the Winners

    History is Rewritten by the Winners

    There’s an old saying, “history is written by the winners.” The saying implies that the perspective and interpretation of historical events have traditionally been controlled by those who were victorious. This further implies that the narratives are biased in favor of the winning side and may not fully represent what happened.

    Although humanity has grown enough to reflect on many historical events, most history is influenced by those who gained power and wrote the books. And there’s no better time than now to see that this controlled interpretation of reality is being distorted by those who have the power to do so.

    I’m talking about January 6, 2021. And I’m talking about Donald Trump.

    Although there is plenty to discuss about Donald Trump’s historic election win in November and his destructive dismantling of democracy in the first few weeks of his presidency, it’s important to look at something specific and dangerous that is unfolding right before our eyes.

    By the time Trump and the hard-lined conservatives get done with their current political terms, their goal is to make the insurrection attempt, incited by Donald Trump, seem like nothing more than a peaceful protest. And it will be achieved through more than just pardoning those terrorists.

    The rewrite of history started before Trump took office. On the fourth anniversary of the horrendous event, elected officials started changing their messaging. Some said nothing. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy did not make an appearance or issue a statement about the events. Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, who had delivered one of the sharpest criticisms of Trump in the days after the attack, was silent and out of town. Many other elected Republicans also decided, now that Trump had won, it was no longer a day that needed commenting on.

    But some went for it. Marjorie Taylor Greene referred to the insurrectionists as “political prisoners.”

    Rep. Mike Collins inserted his foot into his mouth with force, tweeting: “On #ThisDayInHistory in 2021, thousands of peaceful grandmothers gathered in Washington, D.C., to take a self-guided, albeit unauthorized, tour of the U.S. Capitol building. Earlier that day, President Trump held a rally, where supporters walked to the Capitol to peacefully protest the certification of the 2020 election. During this time, some individuals entered the Capitol, took photos, and explored the building before leaving.”

    First impression might show this is someone mocking Republicans changing the narrative, but it was anything but. Collins was serious, and more importantly, was posting with intent—to start a trend that, after Trump would complete his steps in the process of rewriting history, would come off like an accurate memory of what happened on that horrific day.

    After the messages online were planted, Trump didn’t take long to put a dagger in the heart of the Capitol Police by pardoning and commuting more than 1,500 criminals, including those that violently attacked police that day.

    Even though Trump had wavered on what this pardon would look like, and his lackey JD Vance promised every case would be looked at individually and the violent criminals would not be pardoned or commuted, all of them were pardoned or commuted on day one.

    In the defense of some politicians, a handful of Republicans on Capitol Hill made quick statements condemning Trump, but many reminded Americans it wasn’t their decision. And most importantly, in the words of Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, shared “it’s time to move forward.”

    And move forward Johnson did, announcing on January 22nd that he would move forward by creating a new subcommittee on January 6th led by Republicans loyal to MAGA to look back at the events that occurred and break apart the work the original bipartisan committee had completed.

    But, to successfully rewrite history, it would take more than pardoning insurrectionists, tweeting some lies, and pushing a new narrative from an obviously loyal committee. It would require silencing the opposition.

    On January 31st, the Trump administration fired prosecutors involved in the January 6th cases. By February 4th, the administration had gained a detailed list of the more than 5,000 FBI employees that worked on the cases with a clear intent to remove them from the agency.

    The far right had fed their baby parrots and had found a way to remove any lasting legacy that would formally and lawfully say different.

    So, with all the horrific actions Trump and his team have committed so far, why am I opening Political Geekery by reflecting on this specific attempt to change a story we know the truth of?

    Yes, today many of us remember what truly happened on January 6, 2021. Thousands of Trump supporters heard the then lame-duck President commanding them to “fight like hell,” and marched on the United States Capitol, violently attacking police officers as they hunted for Mike Pence, Nancy Pelosi, and any other enemy they could get their hands on.

    But even with that memory being fresh, many have already started to ignore it. Or worse, pretend it wasn’t as bad as it was. They have followed the narrative of “let’s move forward,” starting to ignorantly turn their backs to the truth.

    Why would they have to acknowledge the truth when nobody is in prison being held accountable and those who prosecuted and proved these criminals committed violent acts are fired by Trump’s team under the false pretense of incompetence? Why acknowledge you’re supporting a regime that attacked the very democracy it swears to protect when a new committee finds that the first and bipartisan committee was politically motivated to attack Trump and his so-called patriots? And when we see five to ten more years of prominent Republican officials tweeting and posting on the anniversary about these protesters having been peaceful, why even bother to defend it anymore when the message will have shifted in their favor?

    But it’s not just the Trump supporters of today who will benefit from this rewrite of history. The audience that didn’t witness these horrific events and weren’t sound enough to see America allow an insurrectionist to retake the keys to this country will all see a strongly rewritten and distorted view of history as they come of age and learn about America. And we, as a country, will have learned nothing, leading to a strong possibility of these horrific events occurring the next time a wealthy and selfish man finds himself more important than the country.

    So as Republicans ask you on January 6, 2026 to pray for those political prisoners that were wrongfully prosecuted for just peacefully protesting on January 6, 2021, we will remember that they continue to put Trump over the country. But when they do it on January 6, 2031, will enough people still remember? And what about in 2041?

    And if you don’t believe that this moment in history can be that strongly distorted, ask yourself why Texans so fondly remember the Alamo?

  • Welcome to Political Geekery

    Welcome to Political Geekery

    The political and social landscape of this country has been troublesome in recent years. The Tea Party broke through, radicalizing the political right, and then Trump hijacked that movement with MAGA, turning that radicalization up to crazy times one-hundred.

    Because of this, I started putting some political opinions and not-so-opinions out into the world in the form of a podcast called Diving Deep back in 2020. Four years later, my ability to remain on a consistent political podcasting schedule just isn’t possible. And that’s a problem. Because as we made it through the most tumultuous and bizarre election season of our lifetime in 2024, we somehow came out the other side of it with an insurrectionist who promotes bigotry, hate, and false narratives as the undisputed winner.

    I, like many others, are still in shock and mourning the potential death of democracy and our constitution. And even though I couldn’t find time to podcast on a regular basis, And in doing so, I also couldn’t remain silent. So here we are.

    I will continue to speak up time to time, just now in the form of this blog; Political Geekery. Over time, I might consistently report on what is happening, and litter in some opinion pieces, or I might get in a few articles and then disappear for a bit. We’ll see as this new blog evolves.

    I also don’t know how I will handle what is happening as I try to find peace with the reality of what is going on politically and socially while also finding time for my personal life that not only gives me peace and hope, but also fulfills my soul.

    Either way, I hope you find what you are looking for when you visit. If not, I hope that the truths and opinions I share really set you off.

    Welcome to a new chapter of geek. Welcome to Political Geekery.